Leaderboard Predictions NFL Publishers Posts Methodology Picks

Loading…

A weekly email is coming. Want to hear when it starts?

Website

Your address is kept only for this, never shared, and nothing is sent until the newsletter exists. What we keep.

About Corrections Site Notice Privacy TermsThe GoodApps Company Career App

Max Chadwick Predictions: Record, Accuracy, Every Take | MissedTakes

Leaderboard / Max Chadwick

Max Chadwick

Writes at DLLS Dallas Cowboys (podcast)

Every take from Max Chadwick, including the ones still waiting →

Is Max Chadwick accurate? Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Max Chadwick scores 43.91% accuracy. That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.

43.91%

Accuracy

How often they were right.

—

MissedTakes Score

Versus a naive guess. 0 means no better.

Graded calls

across 1 article. 1 more not yet settled.

Fewer than 10 graded articles. Treat this as provisional.

Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below shows its own arithmetic.

Graded calls · 1

Chadwick's mock has the Cowboys drafting Auburn defensive end Keldrick Falk at No. 12 and Georgia linebacker CJ Allen with their second first-round pick.Jan 16, 2026
- Keldric Faulk to be picked at number 12
  “Max Chadwick, pro football focus... Pick number 12... Keldrick Falk, Auburn.”
  Close · 44Scored 43.91a naive guess scored 50
  How this was scored
  draft:
  2026
  naive:
  a shuffled mock scores 50
  player:
  Keldric Faulk
  season:
  2025
  zero at:
  32
  accuracy:
  43.91
  baseline:
  50
  actual pick:
  31
  difficulty:
  1
  weeks in the season:
  18

We grade claims about outcomes, never claims about people. If something here is wrong — a misattributed quote, a claim we misread, a grade you disagree with — tell us and we will look at it.

pick accuracy:

43.91

predicted pick:

weeks left when called:

mock ordering score:

only one pick — no order to score

Think this grade is wrong?