Publishers
How a masthead has done, across everyone writing under it. Useful when a byline is the site rather than a person — and worth knowing even when it is not, since an outlet is what most readers actually choose.
Counted the same way as a pundit: by article, with a paginated series counting once. A publisher needs ten graded articles before we will rank it.
- Publishers tracked
- 4
- Ranked
- 0
- Too early to rank
- 4
- Graded takes
- 405
ten graded articles or more
Accuracy by publisher
Average score out of 100 across every graded call under that banner. The count beside each bar is how much evidence sits behind it.
- Sharp Football Analysis1 article56.8 · 44 graded
- The 33rd Team5 articles53.5 · 242 graded
- The Draft Network8 articles58.7 · 118 graded
- Pro Football Focus1 article100.0 · 1 graded
Against the baseline
MissedTakes score: accuracy measured against what a naive guess would have scored on the same claims. Zero means no better than guessing — and a publisher can be accurate while scoring badly here, if the calls were easy ones.
- Sharp Football Analysis1 writer+31.2
- The 33rd Team2 writers-3.6
- The Draft Network2 writers-25.6
- Pro Football Focus1 writer—
Too early to rank
These have graded work but not the ten articles it takes before we will put a number on the masthead. The scores above are real; they are just thin.
- Sharp Football Analysisprovisional1 of 10 articles · 44 graded takes
- The 33rd Teamprovisional5 of 10 articles · 242 graded takes
- The Draft Networkprovisional8 of 10 articles · 118 graded takes
- Pro Football Focusprovisional1 of 10 articles · 1 graded takes
405 graded takes across the site so far. Read how the scoring works.