Travis Rodgers

Every take from Travis Rodgers, including the ones still waiting →

Is Travis Rodgers accurate? Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Travis Rodgers scores 100% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 0, which means their calls were no better than a naive guess on the same claims. That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.

100%

Accuracy

How often they were right.

0

MissedTakes Score

Versus a naive guess. 0 means no better.

1

Graded calls

across 1 article. 7 more not yet settled.

Fewer than 10 graded articles. Treat this as provisional.

100% of their claims were specific enough to check. Most of what they said committed to something.

Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below shows its own arithmetic.

Graded calls · 1

Rodgers said the Rams should extend Warren McClendon Jr. and expects them still to address tackle in the draft, though probably not with one of their first-round picks; he also predicted Matthew Stafford will play at least one more season and would not be surprised by a two-year extension.Feb 28, 2026
- Warren McClendon Jr. to move to Los Angeles Rams
  “So I love the idea of bringing him back. ... I would be looking to bring him back for sure.”
  Hit · 100Scored 100a naive guess scored 100+0 skill
  How this was scored
  skill:
  0
  player:
  cfcffe15-7e4c-4729-b596-c719b9052801
  season:
  2025
  claimed:
  LAR
  was with:
  LAR
  accuracy:
  100
  baseline:
  100
  difficulty:
  1
  the naive guess:

he stays where he is

weeks in the season:

18

ended up with:

LAR

weeks left when called:

0

Think this grade is wrong?