Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

David Harrison· Apr 20, 2026

In his final mock draft Monday, Harrison has the Commanders trading back twice and selecting eight players: safety Dylan Thieneman at 16, WR Denzel Boston at 33, RB Mike Washington Jr. at 83, C Jagger Burton at 132, CB Julian Neal at 147, QB Cade Klubnik at 187, DB Lorenzo Styles Jr. at 209 and TE Riley Nowakowski in the seventh round.

“Because the first pick that we make in this mock draft, pick number 16, Dylan Thieneman, safety out of Oregon.”

said on air, transcribed by us · Locked On Commanders (podcast) · read the original →

12 checkable claims — 8 mock draft picks and 4 depth chart calls — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 10 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

8 of 12 have settled so far, averaging 31.5 out of 100, against 50 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Their call against what happened

overall pick
seventh round pick (picks 217–257)They said
169What happened

Their call against what actually happened.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

12 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Riley Nowakowski to be picked “seventh round pick” (picks 217–257)

    “Riley Nowakowski out of Indiana... So he is the seventh round pick wrapping up this mock draft.”

    Miss · 13Scored 12.5 on this pickthis mock ordered the draft 85.71 against a shuffle’s 50+35.71 skill
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    skill:
    35.71
    player:
    Riley Nowakowski
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    12.5
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    169
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    12.5
    predicted pick:
    seventh round pick (picks 217–257)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    85.71

    Think this is wrong?

  • Lorenzo Styles to be picked at number 209

    “Six round two zero nine, the next pick, Lorenzo Styles Junior. I'm calling him a DB.”

    Miss · 20Scored 20.13 on this pickthis mock ordered the draft 85.71 against a shuffle’s 50+35.71 skill
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    skill:
    35.71
    player:
    Lorenzo Styles
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    20.13
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    172
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    20.13
    predicted pick:
    209
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    85.71

    Think this is wrong?

  • Julian Neal to be picked at number 147

    “Now at pick number one forty seven, we come back. Julian Neal, cornerback out of Arkansas.”

    Miss · 13Scored 12.5 on this pickthis mock ordered the draft 85.71 against a shuffle’s 50+35.71 skill
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    skill:
    35.71
    player:
    Julian Neal
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    12.5
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    99
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    12.5
    predicted pick:
    147
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    85.71

    Think this is wrong?

  • Mike Washington to be picked at number 83

    “with the third round pick at number 83, Mike Washington Junior running back out of Arkansas”

    Miss · 18Scored 18.46 on this pickthis mock ordered the draft 85.71 against a shuffle’s 50+35.71 skill
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    skill:
    35.71
    player:
    Mike Washington
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    18.46
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    122
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    18.46
    predicted pick:
    83
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    85.71

    Think this is wrong?

  • Denzel Boston to be picked at number 33

    “the Washington mayor is very happy to have him there at 33, and that is wide receiver Denzel Boston out of Washington”

    Close · 77Scored 77.11 on this pickthis mock ordered the draft 85.71 against a shuffle’s 50+35.71 skill
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    skill:
    35.71
    player:
    Denzel Boston
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    77.11
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    39
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    77.11
    predicted pick:
    33
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    85.71

    Think this is wrong?

  • Jager Burton to be picked at number 132

    “with the one thirty second pick in the NFL draft, the Washington mayors take Jager Jagger Burton... center out of Kentucky”

    Close · 40Scored 40.26 on this pickthis mock ordered the draft 85.71 against a shuffle’s 50+35.71 skill
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    skill:
    35.71
    player:
    Jager Burton
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    40.26
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    153
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    40.26
    predicted pick:
    132
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    85.71

    Think this is wrong?

  • Cade Klubnik to be picked at number 187

    “Six round pick number one eighty seven, quarterback, Cade Clubnik out of Clemson.”

    Miss · 4Scored 3.56 on this pickthis mock ordered the draft 85.71 against a shuffle’s 50+35.71 skill
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    skill:
    35.71
    player:
    Cade Klubnik
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    3.56
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    110
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    3.56
    predicted pick:
    187
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    85.71

    Think this is wrong?

  • Dillon Thieneman to be picked at number 16

    “the first pick that we make in this mock draft, pick number 16, Dylan Thieneman, safety out of Oregon. Great value at number 16.”

    Close · 68Scored 67.71 on this pickthis mock ordered the draft 85.71 against a shuffle’s 50+35.71 skill
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    skill:
    35.71
    player:
    Dillon Thieneman
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    67.71
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    25
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    67.71
    predicted pick:
    16
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    85.71

    Think this is wrong?

  • Cade Klubnik to be 3rd on the depth chart

    “Kave Clubnick, again, third quarterback right now, second quarterback of the future”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Mike Washington to be 3rd on the depth chart

    “Mike Washington junior, who I think will be slotted in as the third back”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Jager Burton to be 3rd on the depth chart

    “Jagger Burton, I think he comes in, and you're gonna probably list him as your third center, but he's gonna compete for that second spot”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Nick Allegretti to be 1st on the depth chart

    “compete even, in year one with Nick Allegretti, though I would probably, project Nick Allegretti to win that battle”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More mock draft picks

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these