Loading…
Loading…
DE · Auburn
43 checkable claims from 28 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
Each pundit’s standing lean on Keldric Faulk, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 84% of the room, across 2 articles · 42.1 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 53% of the room, across 3 articles · 73.0 accuracy on him (3 settled)
more bearish than 58% of the room, across 2 articles · 58.9 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 98% of the room, across 2 articles · 97.9 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 83% of the room, across 2 articles · 62.1 accuracy on him (1 settled)
more bearish than 74% of the room, across 3 articles · 69.0 accuracy on him (3 settled)
Page 2 of 2 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
“31. New England Patriots — Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn”
“Round 1 (No. 30 overall): Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn”
“19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers Selection: Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn”