Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Carter Bahns· Aug 23, 2026

An unsigned CBS Sports preseason overreactions piece judges that Shedeur Sanders will indeed open the season as Cleveland's starting quarterback, that J.J. McCarthy has slipped below the No. 2 spot in Minnesota, and that rookie Trey Smack has solved Green Bay's kicking problem. It dismisses the ideas that De'Zhaun Stribling wins Offensive Rookie of the Year and that the Jets' defense is fixed.

And after Watson's disastrous showing on Saturday, it is hard to picture the veteran winning the job.

published in writing · CBS Sports · read the original →

3 checkable claims — 3 depth chart calls — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 6 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 3 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the room on 1 and below it on 2.

Where this call stands in the room

Shedeur Sanders · 2026 season

36 calls from 30 pundits between 1 and 3. Carter Bahns said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Carter Bahns1the room — 36 calls from 30 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

1They said
1The room (34 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

3 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.