Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Gregg Rosenthal· Sep 3, 2025

Rosenthal picked the Ravens to beat the Lions in the Super Bowl, took the Broncos as his Week 1 survivor pick, liked the Dolphins, Seahawks and Jaguars in their openers, called Jacksonville a sneaky playoff team, and laid out several depth-chart expectations.

But I have the Ravens winning over the Lions in the Super Bowl this year.

said on air or in an interview · Around the NFL (podcast) · read the original →

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence above are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

12 checkable claims — 4 depth chart calls, 4 game outcome picks, 2 conference champions, 1 super bowl pick and 1 surprise team call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 14 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

11 of 12 have settled so far, averaging 47.7 out of 100, against 59.8 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

12 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Baltimore Ravens to reach the Super Bowl

    I have the Ravens winning over the Lions in the Super Bowl this year.

    Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 0+0 skill
    How this was scored
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    BAL
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    champions:
    NE,SEA
    difficulty:
    2
    the naive guess:
    last season's conference champions
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18
    reached the Super Bowl:
    no
    lost the conference final:
    no

    Think this is wrong?

  • Seattle Seahawks to beat San Francisco forty nine Ers

    I picked the Seahawks in this game. I don't I don't feel great about it, but you had to.

    Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 0+0 skill
    How this was scored
    won:
    SF
    score:
    17-13
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    SEA
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    SEA
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Detroit Lions to reach the Super Bowl

    I have the Ravens winning over the Lions in the Super Bowl this year.

    Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 0+0 skill
    How this was scored
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    DET
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    champions:
    NE,SEA
    difficulty:
    2
    the naive guess:
    last season's conference champions
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18
    reached the Super Bowl:
    no
    lost the conference final:
    no

    Think this is wrong?

  • Dont'e Thornton Jr. to be 1st on the depth chart

    you mentioned Dante Thornton, this this rookie who I think is still going to start

    Close · 75Scored 75a naive guess scored 83.33-16.67 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    LV
    skill:
    -16.67
    player:
    Dont'e Thornton Jr.
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    75
    baseline:
    83.33
    position:
    WR
    naive slot:
    2
    actual slot:
    4
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    receptions
    the naive guess:
    no prior season — a rookie is assumed to start behind the incumbent
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    1
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Austin Ekeler to be 1st on the depth chart

    Whenever you know Austin Eckler, I would guess we'll have the most snaps of any of them.

    Close · 75Scored 75a naive guess scored 83.33-16.67 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    WAS
    skill:
    -16.67
    player:
    Austin Ekeler
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    75
    baseline:
    83.33
    position:
    RB
    naive slot:
    2
    actual slot:
    4
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    rushing yards
    the naive guess:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    1
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Luther Burden III to be 4th on the depth chart

    and Luther Burden, who looks pretty interesting, is like the number four

    Hit · 83Scored 83.33a naive guess scored 100-33.33 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    CHI
    skill:
    -33.33
    player:
    Luther Burden III
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    83.33
    baseline:
    100
    position:
    WR
    naive slot:
    2
    actual slot:
    2
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    receptions
    the naive guess:
    no prior season — a rookie is assumed to start behind the incumbent
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    4
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Miami Dolphins to beat Colts

    I like the Dolphins in this game in general ... I mean, I'm picking them, but you guys, why are you taking such big risks?

    Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 100-200 skill
    How this was scored
    won:
    IND
    score:
    8-33
    skill:
    -200
    they picked:
    MIA
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    IND
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Adam Thielen to be 2nd on the depth chart

    You have to bring an Adam Thelen to be your number two, granted only for like three weeks.

    Hit · 92Scored 91.67a naive guess scored 91.67+0 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    PIT
    skill:
    0
    player:
    Adam Thielen
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    91.67
    baseline:
    91.67
    position:
    WR
    naive slot:
    2
    actual slot:
    3
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    receptions
    the naive guess:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    2
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Jacksonville Jaguars to beat Carolina Panthers

    I really like the Jaguars, and this is what I'm looking at here.

    Hit · 100Scored 100a naive guess scored 100+0 skill
    How this was scored
    won:
    JAX
    score:
    10-26
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    JAX
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    JAX
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Denver Broncos to beat Tennessee Titans

    So I'm gonna enjoy watching those great highlights in a totally one sided game. And that's why I'm taking the Broncos as my survivor.

    Hit · 100Scored 100a naive guess scored 100+0 skill
    How this was scored
    won:
    DEN
    score:
    12-20
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    DEN
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    DEN
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Baltimore Ravens to win the Super Bowl

    I too have the Baltimore Ravens winning the Super Bowl ... I have the Ravens winning over the Lions in the Super Bowl this year.

    Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 0+0 skill
    How this was scored
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    BAL
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    champion:
    SEA
    runner up:
    NE
    the naive pick:
    PHI
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Jacksonville Jaguars to beat expectations

    I think the Jaguars could be a sneaky playoff team.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.