Loading…
Loading…
RB · Penn State
43 checkable claims from 22 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
Each pundit’s standing lean on Saquon Barkley, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 50% of the room, across 2 articles · 100.0 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bullish than 50% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 53% of the room, across 3 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 100% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 100% of the room, across 2 articles · 63.7 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 67% of the room, across 13 articles · 79.2 accuracy on him (2 settled)
Page 2 of 2 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
“Saquon Barkley PHI RB ... 266.8 1,174.1 6.7”
“Saquon Barkley ... 1,174.1 6.7”
“The Giants have added no tangible candidates to push Barkley off of significant touches again in 2023.”