Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Pat Fitzmaurice· Sep 8, 2026

In his Week 1 waiver wire column, Fitzmaurice projects Tre Tucker as the Raiders' top receiver, Dontayvion Wicks as Philadelphia's starting X receiver and Malachi Fields as the Giants' No. 2 wideout, calls Ravens rookie Ja'Kobi Lane a compelling sleeper, and says Malik Willis could rush for 1,000 yards over a full season.

Or at least I think Tucker will be the Raiders' lead receiver, and his preseason usage certainly suggested it.

published in writing · FantasyPros · read the original →

5 checkable claims — 3 depth chart calls, 1 player season number and 1 sleeper call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 10 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 4 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the room on 1 and below it on 3.

Where this call stands in the room

Tre Tucker · 2026 season

8 calls from 5 pundits between 1 and 1. Pat Fitzmaurice said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Pat Fitzmaurice1the room — 8 calls from 5 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

1They said
1The room (11 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

5 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.