Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Henry McKenna· Aug 24, 2026

McKenna's preseason notebook: DeVonta Smith takes over as the Eagles' WR1 with rookie Makai Lemon as WR2; Fernando Mendoza will start for the Raiders at some point in 2026; the Browns are the best-positioned team for the 2027 No. 1 overall pick; Houston will end up paying C.J. Stroud; and he flags several rookie receivers as fantasy names to watch.

I still think he'll start at some point this season.

published in writing · Fox Sports · read the original →

9 checkable claims — 4 sleeper calls, 3 depth chart calls, 1 team draft slot call and 1 trade and signing call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 16 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 4 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room on every one.

Where this call stands in the room

Fernando Mendoza · 2026 season

16 calls from 14 pundits between 1 and 2. Henry McKenna said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Henry McKenna1the room — 16 calls from 14 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

overall pick
1They said
4The room (4 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

9 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More sleeper calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.