Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Jordan Dajani· Aug 13, 2026

An unsigned CBS Sports preseason piece makes several depth-chart and roster projections: Deshaun Watson wins the Browns' QB job, the Browns' new offensive line starters are named, Chris Johnson starts immediately for Miami, Jacoby Brissett starts for Arizona, Tua Tagovailoa is the Falcons' frontrunner, Fernando Mendoza will start at some point for the Raiders, Brock Bowers is Cousins' top target, and Ventrell Miller replaces Devin Lloyd.

I'm not going to change my initial prediction that Watson will win this battle, but I'd love to see Sanders make it a tough call for Todd Monken.

published in writing · CBS Sports · read the original →

12 checkable claims — 12 depth chart calls — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 18 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 12 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room on every one.

Where this call stands in the room

Fernando Mendoza · 2026 season

25 calls from 20 pundits between 1 and 3. Jordan Dajani said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Jordan Dajani1the room — 25 calls from 20 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

1They said
1The room (24 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

12 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.