Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Chris Brockman · Aug 5, 2025

Brockman said Russell Wilson is not a Hall of Famer, then delivered a top five list of teams that absolutely cannot win the Super Bowl (Giants, Titans, Browns, Colts, Saints), predicted the Saints get the No. 1 pick next year, the Browns pick in the top five, Joe Flacco won't be a starter in October, and Myles Garrett could win Defensive Player of the Year again.

The Saints have absolutely 0.0 less than Blutarski chance of winning the Super Bowl.

said on air, transcribed by us · The Rich Eisen Show (podcast) · read the original →

5 checkable claims from this

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Myles Garrett to win Defensive Player of the Year

    Miles Garrett is awesome, and he's going to the hall of fame, and he might win defensive player of the year again this year.

    Hit · 100Scored 100a naive guess scored 0+200 skill
    How this was scored
    award:
    defensive_player_of_the_year
    naive:
    the naive pick was Pat Surtain II, who won it the year before
    skill:
    200
    player:
    Myles Garrett
    season:
    2025
    winner:
    Myles Garrett
    correct:
    true
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Cleveland Browns to pick “picking in the top five” (picks 1–5)

    The Browns absolutely cannot win. They play in an impossible division. I'm sorry. They're gonna be picking in the top five.

    Hit · 84Scored 84.09a naive guess scored 100-31.82 skill
    How this was scored
    team:
    CLE
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    they picked 5 the year before
    skill:
    -31.82
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    84.09
    baseline:
    100
    actual pick:
    9
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted pick:
    picking in the top five (picks 1–5)
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • New Orleans Saints to pick at number 1

    I would bet a serious amount of money that they're gonna have the number one pick in the draft next year

    Close · 74Scored 73.84a naive guess scored 95.76-43.84 skill
    How this was scored
    team:
    NO
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    they picked 9 the year before
    skill:
    -43.84
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    73.84
    baseline:
    95.76
    actual pick:
    8
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted pick:
    1
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Joe Flacco to be 2nd on the depth chart

    Flacco, if if he makes it out of September alive, I'll be shocked, man. I will be shocked if he's a starter in October.

    Hit · 92Scored 91.67a naive guess scored 91.67+0 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    CIN
    skill:
    0
    player:
    Joe Flacco
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    91.67
    baseline:
    91.67
    position:
    QB
    naive slot:
    2
    actual slot:
    1
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    passing yards
    naive basis:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    2
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Russell Wilson to be 2nd on the depth chart

    They got a quarterback in Russell Wilson, who is on the last legs of his career. Probably only gonna play half the year, it may be less than before a rookie goes in there.

    Hit · 100Scored 100a naive guess scored 91.67+16.67 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    NYG
    skill:
    16.67
    player:
    Russell Wilson
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    91.67
    position:
    QB
    naive slot:
    1
    actual slot:
    2
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    passing yards
    naive basis:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    2
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.