Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Mike Renner· Aug 26, 2026

An unsigned CBS Sports big board ranks the top 100 prospects for the 2027 NFL Draft, with Arch Manning first overall, and attaches specific draft-range projections to several prospects (Leonard Moore top five, Trevor Goosby top 10, first-round calls on Cam Coleman, Greg Johnson, Trevor Lauck and Brauntae Johnson).

While there's no shortage of holes to poke in Arch Manning's 2025 tape, he ends up at No. 1 overall for two big reasons

published in writing · CBS Sports · read the original →

8 checkable claims — 7 mock draft picks and 1 top player list — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 8 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 1 unsettled call enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room.

Where this call stands in the room

Arch Manning · 2026 season · overall pick

3 calls from 3 pundits between 1 overall pick and 1 overall pick. Mike Renner said 1 overall pick. the room's median is 1 overall pick. not settled yet

Mike Renner1 overall pickthe room — 3 calls from 3 punditsmedian 1 overall pick

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

overall pick
1They said
1The room (3 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

8 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Arch Manning to be picked at number 1

    While there's no shortage of holes to poke in Arch Manning's 2025 tape, he ends up at No. 1 overall for two big reasons

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Leonard Moore to be picked “top five” (picks 1–5)

    He could take the year off and still go in the top five .

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Brauntae Johnson to be picked “first-round safety” (picks 1–32)

    With a long wingspan and easy playmaking ability, he could easily be the next first-round safety .

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Trevor Goosby to be picked “top 10” (picks 1–10)

    if he can show any stretch of play like he did toward the end of 2025, he's a safe bet to go in the top 10 .

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Cam Coleman to be picked “first-rounder” (picks 1–32)

    While he could stand to get more consistent in his route running, his floor is very much a first-rounder.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Trevor Lauck to be picked “first-rounder” (picks 1–32)

    If his play strength improves, he should be a first-rounder.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Greg Johnson to be picked “first-rounder” (picks 1–32)

    If the career progression we've already seen in nearly three years as a starter continues, he'll be a first-rounder.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Top Player ListsAug 26, 2026

    Big board ranking the top 100 prospects for the 2027 draft class, from 1. Arch Manning, QB, Texas through 100. Quincy Rhodes Jr., EDGE, Arkansas

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More mock draft picks

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.