Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Gregg Rosenthal· Apr 16, 2025

Rosenthal puts Travis Hunter atop the receiver class with Matthew Golden and Tetairoa McMillan next and Emeka Egbuka fourth, prefers Colston Loveland to Tyler Warren among tight ends, expects Harold Fannin Jr. to be a second-round pick, and picks Kyle Williams as the non-premium prospect most likely to make Pro Bowls.

it's why I have him fourth. I do have him behind behind Gold and T Mac

said on air or in an interview · Around the NFL (podcast) · read the original →

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence above are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

4 checkable claims — 2 top player lists, 1 mock draft pick and 1 pro bowl and all-pro call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 2 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

All 4 have settled, averaging 22 out of 100, against 62.5 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

4 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Top Player ListsApr 16, 2025

    And that's why I like Loveland more because to me, it's like I would take Loveland on twenty six twenty seven teams

    Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 50-100 skill
    How this was scored
    naive:
    a coin-flip ordering scores 50
    skill:
    -100
    placed:
    2
    season:
    2025
    players:
    2
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    50
    by position:
    TE 2: 0
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    could not place:
    0
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Kyle Williams to make Pro Bowl

    if I needed to pick one player from this class that that would like make Pro Bowls that has a you know, I think that that isn't gonna get taken in these tops

    Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 100-200 skill
    How this was scored
    made:
    no
    naive:
    he did not make it the year before, so the naive pick said no
    skill:
    -200
    player:
    Kyle Williams
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    100
    selection:
    pro_bowl
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Top Player ListsApr 16, 2025

    To me, he is right there with like the Jamar Chases and the best wide receiver prospects... it's why I have him fourth. I do have him behind behind Gold and T Mac... I have him right there with gold and I haven't really made a decision.

    Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 50-100 skill
    How this was scored
    naive:
    a coin-flip ordering scores 50
    skill:
    -100
    placed:
    3
    season:
    2025
    players:
    4
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    50
    by position:
    WR 3: 0
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    could not place:
    0
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Harold Fannin Jr. to be picked “second round” (picks 33–64)

    I actually would feel more comfortable probably going drafting Fannin ahead of his consensus. Then I would which will probably be what second round

    Hit · 88Scored 87.81a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2025
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Harold Fannin Jr.
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    87.81
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    67
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    87.81
    predicted pick:
    second round (picks 33–64)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More top player lists

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.