Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Raymond Summerlin· Sep 15, 2026

In a Week 2 fantasy waiver-wire column, Summerlin ranks the top pickups at each position, projects several players' roles on their teams' depth charts (Kaelon Black as a handcuff behind McCaffrey, Adonai Mitchell as the Jets' clear No. 2, Tre Harris as the Chargers' No. 2 if McConkey sits, Tre Tucker as Las Vegas' No. 1), and predicts Michael Penix and Shedeur Sanders will eventually take over as starters.

Douglas is the receiver add this week with the best chance to be the long-term No. 1 option in his passing game.

published in writing · Sharp Football Analysis · read the original →

14 checkable claims — 10 depth chart calls and 4 fantasy rankings — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 18 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 9 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room on every one.

Where this call stands in the room

Shedeur Sanders · 2026 season

16 calls from 14 pundits between 1 and 2. Raymond Summerlin said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Raymond Summerlin1the room — 16 calls from 14 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

1They said
1The room (20 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

14 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.