Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Tyler Sullivan· Aug 12, 2026

An unsigned CBS Sports piece naming each AFC team's most valuable non-quarterback for the 2026 season, which includes a few checkable claims: Michael Pittman Jr. as Pittsburgh's clear No. 2 receiver who could lead the team in targets, Malik Willis as Miami's full-time starter, Fernando Mendoza eventually taking over as the Raiders' QB1, and Jacksonville repeating as AFC South champions.

If he can carry that momentum into 2026 and match the prolific play of the offense, the Jaguars could be looking at consecutive seasons as AFC South champions.

published in writing · CBS Sports · read the original →

4 checkable claims — 3 depth chart calls and 1 division winner — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 7 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 3 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room on every one.

Where this call stands in the room

Fernando Mendoza · 2026 season

30 calls from 24 pundits between 1 and 3. Tyler Sullivan said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Tyler Sullivan1the room — 30 calls from 24 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

2They said
2The room (7 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

4 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.