Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Nathan Jahnke· Aug 17, 2026

In his preseason Week 1 fantasy reactions, Jahnke argues Jonathon Brooks will handle the bulk of Carolina's rushing work and be the more valuable back over Chuba Hubbard, sees Jeremiyah Love ahead of Tyler Allgeier in Arizona, warns off Cam Skattebo at his ADP, expects the Pollard/Spears split to narrow, and places several rookie receivers on their teams' depth charts.

That type of split would likely make Brooks the more valuable fantasy back of the two.

published in writing · Pro Football Focus · read the original →

12 checkable claims — 7 depth chart calls, 4 sleeper calls and 1 fantasy bust call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 18 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 7 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the room on 4 and below it on 3.

Where this call stands in the room

Caleb Douglas · 2026 season

9 calls from 7 pundits between 1 and 2. Nathan Jahnke said 2. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Nathan Jahnke2the room — 9 calls from 7 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

2They said
1The room (11 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

12 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.