Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Gregg Rosenthal · Mar 3, 2025

Gregg Rosenthal predicted both Ohio State running backs go in the top 50, that Cam Ward has a decent chance to go No. 1 overall and won't fall past the first couple of picks, that Shedeur Sanders is a tier below him, that Jackson Dart won't be drafted much higher than Jalen Hurts' late-second slot, that Brady Cook won't be drafted, and that DeVante Adams is somewhat likely to be cut by the Jets.

There's a decent chance cam Wards still goes number one.

said on air or in an interview · read the original →

11 checkable claims from this

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Mock Draft PicksMar 3, 2025

    There's a decent chance cam Wards still goes number one, whether it's to the Titans or a team trading up, and that he is not going to fall, you know, past the first couple of picks

    Scored 100a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2025
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Cam Ward
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    1
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    100
    predicted pick:
    1
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

  • Mock Draft PicksMar 3, 2025

    one that has a chance to get taken maybe in the first round and certainly in the first, you know forty to. Fifty, picks

    Scored 100a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2025
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Maxwell Hairston
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    30
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    100
    predicted pick:
    maybe in the first round and certainly in the first forty to fifty picks (picks 1–32)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

  • Luke McCaffrey is number three, Deebo's number two, Terry mclaurin's number one

    Scored 83.33a naive guess scored 100-33.33 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    WAS
    skill:
    -33.33
    player:
    Luke McCaffrey
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    83.33
    baseline:
    100
    position:
    WR
    naive slot:
    5
    actual slot:
    5
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    receptions
    naive basis:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    3
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Luke McCaffrey is number three, Deebo's number two, Terry mclaurin's number one

    Scored 91.67a naive guess scored 91.67+0 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    WAS
    skill:
    0
    player:
    Terry McLaurin
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    91.67
    baseline:
    91.67
    position:
    WR
    naive slot:
    1
    actual slot:
    2
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    receptions
    naive basis:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    1
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Luke McCaffrey is number three, Deebo's number two, Terry mclaurin's number one

    Scored 91.67a naive guess scored 91.67+0 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    WAS
    skill:
    0
    player:
    Deebo Samuel Sr.
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    91.67
    baseline:
    91.67
    position:
    WR
    naive slot:
    2
    actual slot:
    1
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    receptions
    naive basis:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    2
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Mock Draft PicksMar 3, 2025

    That that sort of talent to me seems like a very intriguing second round type of. Player

    Scored 100a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2025
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Jayden Higgins
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    34
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    100
    predicted pick:
    a very intriguing second round type of player (picks 33–64)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

  • Mock Draft PicksMar 3, 2025

    there's. A chance there's a chance he could go in the top ten in, THIS draft

    Scored 100a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2025
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Armand Membou
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    7
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    100
    predicted pick:
    a chance he could go in the top ten (picks 1–10)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

  • Mock Draft PicksMar 3, 2025

    Yeah, he's not gonna get drafted.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the season it describes has finished.

    Think this is wrong?

  • I think he's somewhat likely to get cut unless unless he can work out a contract with a new team that lowers that number.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the season it describes has finished.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Mock Draft PicksMar 3, 2025

    one of the two Ohio state running backs that we'll get taken top fifty, I would say

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the season it describes has finished.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Mock Draft PicksMar 3, 2025

    one of the two Ohio state running backs that we'll get taken top fifty, I would say

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the season it describes has finished.

    Think this is wrong?

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.