Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Andrew Erickson· Aug 5, 2026

Erickson expects Malik Nabers to be available for Week 1 after avoiding the PUP list, though with missed time built into expectations; he calls Xavier Worthy a post-hype breakout candidate; he views Alec Pierce as Indianapolis' top receiver in 2026; and he expects Davante Adams to decline rather than repeat 2025, calling his current ADP too rich.

When you look at the totality: the age, the injury, the TD regression risk, the declining efficiency numbers: easy to see a player far more likely to fall off than to replicate 2025.

published in writing · FantasyPros · read the original →

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence above are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

3 checkable claims — 1 depth chart call, 1 fantasy bust call and 1 sleeper call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 6 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 1 unsettled call enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room.

Where this call stands in the room

Alec Pierce · 2026 season

9 calls from 9 pundits between 1 and 4. Andrew Erickson said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Andrew Erickson1the room — 9 calls from 9 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

3 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.