Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Cleveland Browns 2026: The Coverage Report — Median Volume, Second-Best Accuracy, and 32 Cutdown Calls Still Ungraded

By Ben Garves

One post per club, all 32, built off the post-cutdown calendar. Everything below measures the outlets and pundits *we track* — podcasts, national TV shows, draft analysts and the fantasy circuit that we log and grade. It is not a census of all football media.

The baseline: Cleveland is the median team

Across the whole database, our tracked sources have produced 19,341 Cleveland Browns-and-everyone-else team takes, of which 6,785 are graded. That's an average of 604 takes and 212 graded per club.

The Browns: 668 takes, 212 graded. Eleventh in raw volume, tied with San Francisco for 15th–16th in graded volume, and exactly on the league average for graded calls. If you were looking for a neglect story, this isn't one. Cleveland got a normal amount of attention for a team that went 5-12 in 2025 and 3-14 in 2024, with its last playoff trip in 2023 (11-6) under a different staff — Todd Monken is the head coach of record here, Andrew Berry the general manager.

What's unusual is not how much was said, but how it graded. The field's average accuracy on Browns takes is 67.6, second-highest of any club in the database behind Seattle (75.0). The average skill delta over the naive baseline is +23.9.

Browns coverage, in one line

Two things drive that. First, the 2025 draft: Travis Hunter to Cleveland at No. 2 was the single most-agreed-upon call in the sample, and it landed. Fourteen Browns takes name Hunter, 13 graded, average accuracy 100.0. Second, depth-chart calls, where 36 graded Browns entries average 96.8 accuracy — a reminder that "who starts at right guard" is a much easier question than the ones pundits get paid to answer.

The cutdown: 40 roster-spot calls, and the 2026 ones haven't graded

This is the series' news hook, so here is the honest version: of 40 roster-spot calls on the Browns, only eight are graded, and all eight were made in the 2025 cycle. The 32 calls from this summer's cutdown are still pending. There are no graded 2026 surprises to lead with, because nothing from this August has resolved yet.

What's on the record and waiting:

  • Nathan Jahnke, twice in three days, on Cleveland's Week 3 preseason snap counts: "A few players who played for Cleveland in this game are likely to make the roster, including running back Raheim Sanders, seventh-round rookie tight end Carsen Ryan."
  • Nick Pedone, previewing the preseason finale, called the receiver room settled: "Jerry Jeudy, KC Concepcion, Denzel Boston, Isaiah Bond and Tylan Wallace are very likely to make this roster." Five names, five pending grades.
  • Bradley Locker put Dillon Gabriel on a 10-player leaguewide bubble list, framing the finale as a Gabriel-vs-Taylen Green decision for QB3. Jacob Richard went further the same week — Gabriel "could be the most likely to go," Deshaun Watson "is not moving."
  • Ty Kohler backed Adin Huntington, Julian Okwara, Winston Reid and Easton Mascarenas-Arnold, and Rafael Zamorano projected a full 53 including Austin Barber, Parker Brailsford and the specialist trio.

We'll grade all of it. Today it's a scoreboard with no runs on it.

The eight that *did* grade — claimed between April and August 2025, resolved on August 19, 2026 — went seven hits and one miss, 87.5 average accuracy, +100 average skill. The story in them is Shedeur Sanders, whose place on the 53 was genuinely contested. Rich Eisen took the yes side twice, in June ("Chidor makes the browns and crushes a start") and again in August. Because Sanders had never been on anyone's 53, the naive baseline said no; Sanders spent 17 weeks on the roster, and Eisen's calls scored 100 accuracy and +200 skill apiece. Kyle Brandt's Gabriel call graded the same way. The lone miss belongs to John Middlekauff, who said a receiver on the fringe was "going to be on the team": zero weeks on the 53, accuracy 0.

The two safe ones — Gregg Rosenthal on Cedric Tillman, Chase Edmonds on Joe Flacco being "the only one that's going to be there for sure" — were both right and both scored +0 skill. Correct, but the baseline already knew.

What else carries a grade

Browns takes by claim type

Mock drafts are the bulk of the graded Browns record: 115 calls, 100 graded, 68.9 average accuracy, +34.8 skill. The 2026 cycle produced a second consensus that held. Cleveland actually took Spencer Fano ninth and KC Concepcion 24th, and Concepcion at 24 was called on the nose by Daniel Jeremiah ("Let's get the receiver Casey concepts out of Texas A and m", 100 accuracy, +40.7 skill), JP Acosta back on March 2, Bucky Brooks on February 5, Derek Brown, Scott Bogman and KCSN's KC Laboratory. Six independent bullseyes on one pick.

The counterweight is the fantasy desk. Nine graded sleeper calls on Browns players, average accuracy 0.0, average skill −177.8 — the worst type-level number on this team by a distance. Cedric Tillman was pitched as a late-round WR2 by two different analysts and finished WR98. Shedeur Sanders was a streamer recommendation in December and January and finished QB37.

Sanders is also the most-covered Brown in the file: 64 takes, 23 graded, 58.4 accuracy. Quinshon Judkins has 40 takes but only four graded. Concepcion has 36 takes, seven graded. A lot of Cleveland punditry is still in the queue.

Who has a named record here

Eleven pundits clear a floor of five graded Browns takes. That is a small sample for any of them, so read this as a ledger and not a ranking — five to 19 graded calls is not enough to separate skill from a good week.

Average accuracy on Browns takes

Rich Eisen's 97.4 on 11 graded calls is the eye-catcher, built on the Sanders roster calls and a No. 2-overall mock. Nick Wright has the largest graded sample on this team, 19, at 82.2. Mel Kiper is 88.9 on five. On the other side, Kyle Crabbs has 13 graded Browns calls at 37.7 accuracy — though his skill delta is +35.7, because mock picks are scored against the ordering a shuffled mock would produce, not just the bullseye. The Miz sits at 25.0 on eight, a number that includes picking the Browns to win Super Bowl LX.

By outlet, Move the Sticks leads the meaningful samples at 78.4 accuracy on 28 graded Browns takes; The Herd has the most volume, 46 graded, at 60.4 and a negative skill delta of −11.2.

Nothing on the 2026 season itself has resolved — no win totals, no game outcomes, no roster verdicts. Check back after Week 1, when the first of those 32 pending cutdown calls starts turning into a score. Full scoring rules are on the methodology page.