Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Gregg Rosenthal· Jul 25, 2025

Rosenthal leans toward the 49ers being one of his playoff teams and says the Buccaneers are clearly on top of the NFC South, with the Falcons in the middle and the Saints and Panthers at the bottom. He also expects Cam Hart and Tarheeb Still to both start at cornerback for the Chargers.

I haven't decided whether like they're going to be one of my playoff teams or not, but i'd probably lean towards yes.

said on air or in an interview · Around the NFL (podcast) · read the original →

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence above are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

4 checkable claims — 2 depth chart calls, 1 division winner and 1 playoff pick — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 5 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

All 4 have settled, averaging 72.9 out of 100, against 47.9 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Their call against what happened

1They said
2What happened

Their call against what actually happened.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

4 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Cam Hart to be 1st on the depth chart

    Cam Hart was very good for them too, and they're both going to start

    Hit · 92Scored 91.67a naive guess scored 91.67+0 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    LAC
    skill:
    0
    player:
    Cam Hart
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    91.67
    baseline:
    91.67
    position:
    CB
    naive slot:
    1
    actual slot:
    2
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    defensive snaps
    the naive guess:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    1
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Tarheeb Still to be 1st on the depth chart

    Picks like ar Heep still was so good last year... Cam Hart was very good for them too, and they're both going to start

    Hit · 100Scored 100a naive guess scored 100+0 skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    LAC
    skill:
    0
    player:
    Tarheeb Still
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    100
    position:
    CB
    naive slot:
    1
    actual slot:
    1
    difficulty:
    2
    measured by:
    defensive snaps
    the naive guess:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    1
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers to win the division

    I think the bucks are kind of clearly on top, and that the Falcons are kind of clearly in the middle of those groups

    Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 0+0 skill
    How this was scored
    skill:
    0
    method:
    division winners read off the bracket: the bye teams and the wild-card hosts
    they picked:
    TB
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    TB
    difficulty:
    2
    the naive guess:
    last season's winner of the same division
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18
    won the division:
    no

    Think this is wrong?

  • San Francisco 49ers to make the playoffs

    I haven't decided whether like they're going to be one of my playoff teams or not, but i'd probably lean towards yes

    Hit · 100Scored 100a naive guess scored 0+200 skill
    How this was scored
    team:
    SF
    skill:
    200
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive guess said:
    no
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    made the playoffs:
    yes
    weeks left when called:
    18

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.