Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Pat Fitzmaurice· Aug 6, 2026

Fitzmaurice names four players he's targeting in 2026 fantasy drafts: Trevor Lawrence (a top-10 QB with high-end QB1 upside being drafted as a low-end QB1), Bucky Irving (buy the dip, still a workhorse rather than committee back), Christian Watson (potential for special production with increased targets), and rookie Makai Lemon (worth his WR39 cost, could be a star immediately).

It seems as if everyone in the fantasy community is fading Bucky Irving. I'm buying.

published in writing · FantasyPros · read the original →

6 checkable claims — 4 sleeper calls, 1 depth chart call and 1 positional finishe — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 8 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 2 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the room on 1 and below it on 1.

Where this call stands in the room

Bucky Irving · 2026 season

6 calls from 5 pundits between 1 and 1. Pat Fitzmaurice said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Pat Fitzmaurice1the room — 6 calls from 5 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

1They said
1The room (7 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

6 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More sleeper calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.