Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Andrew Erickson· Sep 16, 2026

In his Week 2 'Beyond the Waiver Wire' column, Erickson makes a long series of buy/sell/add calls on individual players (sleepers vs. busts), plus a few specific role, availability and outlook predictions — notably that Jahmyr Gibbs scores again Thursday night, that Drew Lock remains Seattle's starter, and that Kenneth Walker III leads the NFL in rushing yards.

Nobody should be panicked about the No. 3 consensus pick in 2026 fantasy football drafts.

published in writing · FantasyPros · read the original →

109 checkable claims — 54 sleeper calls, 23 depth chart calls, 23 fantasy bust calls, 3 positional finishes, 2 availability calls, 2 fantasy defense calls, 1 player season number and 1 roster spot call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 130 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 25 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room on every one.

Where this call stands in the room

Drew Lock · 2026 season

9 calls from 9 pundits between 1 and 1. Andrew Erickson said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Andrew Erickson1the room — 9 calls from 9 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

109 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More sleeper calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.