Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Derek Brown· Aug 1, 2026

Brown names Bucky Irving, TreVeyon Henderson and Chuba Hubbard as running backs he is avoiding at their 2026 ADP, arguing Irving's efficiency and injury history are concerning, that Henderson won't pass Rhamondre Stevenson and is only an upside RB3, and that Hubbard was the league's most inefficient back and could be leapfrogged by a healthy Jonathon Brooks.

I'll be avoiding Hubbard in drafts this year.

published in writing · FantasyPros · read the original →

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 1, 2026. The quote and evidence above are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

3 checkable claims — 3 depth chart calls — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 3 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 2 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room on every one.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

3 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Rhamondre Stevenson to be 1st on the depth chart

    I don't know how Henderson overtakes Stevenson in 2026 if both of these players continue to post per-touch efficiency metrics like they did last season.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Jonathon Brooks to be 1st on the depth chart

    If Jonathon Brooks is fully healthy (I think he will be), he could easily be the backfield leader coming out of camp.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • TreVeyon Henderson to be 2nd on the depth chart

    I don't know how Henderson overtakes Stevenson in 2026... Henderson could eat into Stevenson's workload more in 2026 if he can take another step and payoff as an RB2, but he 's best viewed as an upside RB3.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.