Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Andrew Erickson · Sep 11, 2025

Erickson's Week 2 wide receiver ranks had Nico Collins at 3, AJ Brown 11, Garrett Wilson 15, Emeka Egbuka 20, Jameson Williams 21, Calvin Ridley 26 and Ricky Pearsall 33, and he argued Jaylen Waddle can still be a top-36 receiver.

I'm going right back to the well here with Jalen Waddle. I still think that he can be a top thirty six receiver.

said on air or in an interview · read the original →

2 checkable claims from this

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • I'm going right back to the well here with Jalen Waddle. I still think that he can be a top thirty six receiver.

    Scored 0a naive guess scored 0+0 skill
    How this was scored
    skill:
    0
    player:
    Jaylen Waddle
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    12
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    position:
    WR
    ranked by:
    fantasy points
    difficulty:
    1.94
    naive basis:
    where he finished last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    naive finish:
    48
    actual finish:
    19
    weeks left when called:
    17
    predicted finish:
    36

    Think this is wrong?

  • Fantasy RankingsSep 11, 2025

    you got him three, you got him really high this week... Erickson has got him at eleven... Fifteen. You are not like out necessarily on Garrett Wilson... Ericson, you are right on consensus (Agbuka at twenty)... Ericson, you are the highest wide receiver twenty one... you've got him at wide receiver twenty six... Ericson, you've got him at thirty three

    Scored 85.71a naive guess scored 50+69.29 skill
    How this was scored
    naive:
    a coin-flip ordering scores 50
    skill:
    69.29
    placed:
    7
    season:
    2025
    players:
    7
    accuracy:
    85.71
    baseline:
    50
    by position:
    WR 7: 85.71
    difficulty:
    1.94
    weeks in the season:
    18
    could not place:
    0
    weeks left when called:
    17

    Think this is wrong?

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.