Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Bucky Brooks · Mar 2, 2025

Brooks argues Jalen Milroe should be a second-round pick, ideally landing behind a running quarterback, and touts Matthew Golden as potentially the class's top wide receiver. He also believes the running back depth means teams can land frontline starters in rounds two and three.

I think it should be the mill Roe situation.

said on air or in an interview · read the original →

2 checkable claims from this

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Mock Draft PicksMar 2, 2025

    that does still feel like a second round type of selection in similarity to how the Eagles went about getting Jalen Hurts... I think it should be the mill Roe situation.

    Scored 29.73a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2025
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Jalen Milroe
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    29.73
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    92
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    29.73
    predicted pick:
    second round type of selection (picks 33–64)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

  • and now you're seeing buzz Is Matthew golden gonna be the new wide, receiver one of the. Class

    Scored 35.36a naive guess scored 16.05+19.31 skill
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2025
    naive:
    naming one of the 31 at random averages 16.05
    skill:
    19.31
    player:
    Matthew Golden
    season:
    2025
    zero at:
    credit halves every two places
    accuracy:
    35.36
    baseline:
    16.05
    position:
    wide receiver
    class size:
    31
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    actual order:
    4
    predicted order:
    1
    weeks left when called:
    0

    Think this is wrong?

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.