Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Ollie Connolly· Apr 17, 2026

Connelly assesses the 2026 draft class: he sees Jeremiah Love as a top-ten most productive player at running back with an Ezekiel Elliott-to-Bijan/McCaffrey range, projects Fernando Mendoza as a top-8-to-12 starting QB in the league, pegs Ty Simpson as a top-of-the-second-round pick he'd only be comfortable taking in the third, and slots various tight ends and late running backs into specific rounds.

I think you're getting someone where the benchmark is going to be top ten most productive play at his position.

said on air or in an interview · Around the NFL (podcast) · read the original →

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence above are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

9 checkable claims — 6 mock draft picks, 2 positional finishes and 1 position order call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 10 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

4 of 9 have settled so far, averaging 27.8 out of 100, against 50 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Of the 2 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room on every one.

Their call against what happened

overall pick
second or third round pick (picks 33–100)They said
138What happened

Their call against what actually happened.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

9 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Kyle Louis to be picked “second or third round pick” (picks 33–100)

    Kyle Lewis, who's going to be a second or third round pick as a linebacker or safety

    Miss · 19Scored 19.28a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Kyle Louis
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    19.28
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    138
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    19.28
    predicted pick:
    second or third round pick (picks 33–100)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

  • Kaelon Black to be picked “potential sixth round pick types” (picks 182–216)

    he'll probably be on the field more than other potential sixth round pick types

    Miss · 2Scored 1.86a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Kaelon Black
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    1.86
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    90
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    1.86
    predicted pick:
    potential sixth round pick types (picks 182–216)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

  • Demond Claiborne to be picked “fourth or fifth round” (picks 101–181)

    Maybe he's probably gonna go in the fourth or fifth round.

    Close · 48Scored 47.88a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Demond Claiborne
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    47.88
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    198
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    47.88
    predicted pick:
    fourth or fifth round (picks 101–181)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

  • Ty Simpson to be picked “top of the second round” (picks 33–64)

    Well, you're probably going to have to do it the top of the second round.

    Close · 42Scored 42.04a naive guess scored 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Ty Simpson
    season:
    2026
    zero at:
    32
    accuracy:
    42.04
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    13
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    42.04
    predicted pick:
    top of the second round (picks 33–64)
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score

    Think this is wrong?

  • Fernando Mendoza to finish top 12 at his position, by passing yards

    to push on him be maybe a top twelve to top eight starts in the league

    Too vague to check — we could not tell what would count as right.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Jeremiyah Love to finish top 10 at his position, by rushing yards

    And I think you're getting someone where the benchmark is going to be top ten most productive play at his position.

    Too vague to check — we could not tell what would count as right.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Kenyon Sadiq to be picked “maybe it's mole down in the teens the twenties”

    no it feels like the range has come down slightly from Post COMBINE i would say that maybe it's mole down in the teens the twenties

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Will Kacmarek to be picked “an early day three”

    but if you think he's one of the top two blocking tight, ends that feels like an early day. Three

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Sonny Styles to be the second or third best player of role in the class at his position off the board

    I love Sunny Styles. I think he's maybe the second or third best player of role in the class.

    Too vague to check — we could not tell what would count as right.

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More mock draft picks

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.