Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Hondo Carpenter· Aug 18, 2026

Covering a Raiders-Texans joint practice, Carpenter says rookie Fernando Mendoza's first-team reps do not signal a quarterback competition and that Kirk Cousins remains the Raiders' starting quarterback.

Kirk Cousins remains No. 1.

published in writing · Sports Illustrated · read the original →

One checkable claim, graded on its own against what actually happened.

It names 2 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

Nothing to score yet: this grades once the result is in.

Of the 1 unsettled call enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room.

Where this call stands in the room

Kirk Cousins · 2026 season

60 calls from 48 pundits between 1 and 2. Hondo Carpenter said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Hondo Carpenter1the room — 60 calls from 48 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

1They said
1The room (48 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

1 checkable claim in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Kirk Cousins to be 1st on the depth chart

    Don’t read into that as if there is a QB controversy, because there isn’t. The plan was to get the prized rookie those reps against an elite NFL defense. Kirk Cousins remains No. 1.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.