Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Tom Strachan· Aug 31, 2026

Views CeeDee Lamb's down 2025 as a blip and a value buy, while writing off Mark Andrews as no longer a useful fantasy asset.

If you're happy to believe 2025 was a blip rather than the new normal, it becomes easier to see Lamb as a value pick in this range.

published in writing · FantasyPros · read the original →

2 checkable claims — 1 fantasy bust call and 1 sleeper call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 4 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

2 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Mark Andrews to fall short of his draft cost

    Andrews had a career-low 422 receiving yards because when he did get the ball, he did nothing with it. That's not an ideal fantasy asset, and the Ravens seem very confident in their rookie class.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • CeeDee Lamb to outplay his draft cost

    it becomes easier to see Lamb as a value pick in this range. Betting on Lamb's well-established connection with Dak Prescott and this team as a whole to bounce back isn't the worst bet in the world.

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More fantasy bust calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.