Loading…
Loading…
WR · LSU
50 checkable claims from 30 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
Each pundit’s standing lean on Justin Jefferson, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 82% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bullish than 54% of the room, across 2 articles · 70.8 accuracy on him (1 settled)
more bullish than 51% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 80% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 79% of the room, across 15 articles · 70.9 accuracy on him (4 settled)
more bearish than 71% of the room, across 2 articles · 0.0 accuracy on him (1 settled)
Page 2 of 2 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
Not settled yet. These are graded once the season or event they describe has finished.
“And then the obligatory always in Justin Jefferson... The only thing I can put here is he needs fifty three yards for one thousand”
“It's not about Justin Jefferson. He's back from the hamstring. He's gonna be good to go week one.”
“I still think Jefferson is the best receiver in football”
“He was wide receiver four in ECR yesterday he's moved up to three and you guys both have him at six.”
“you guys both have him at six”
“I am predicting here that this is the Justin Jefferson game. We finally get him back. I'm calling it top fifteen ish.”
“Vikings WR Justin Jefferson (1 vote: Jennings)”
“Justin Jefferson MIN WR ... 184.0 114.1 1,665.2 8.6”
“Justin Jefferson ... 114.1 1,665.2”