Loading…
Loading…
QB · Clemson
53 checkable claims from 20 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
Each pundit’s standing lean on Trevor Lawrence, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 100% of the room, across 2 articles · 100.0 accuracy on him (1 settled)
more bullish than 79% of the room, across 3 articles · on him not settled yet
more bullish than 69% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 94% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 66% of the room, across 5 articles · 50.0 accuracy on him (1 settled)
Page 2 of 2 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
Not settled yet. These are graded once the season or event they describe has finished.
more bearish than 61% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
“I think Trevor Lawrence could beat his ADPs going around the quarterback twenty. I think he should be more so a low end QB one, high m QB two.”
“But there's Trevor Lawrence all the way up towards a top four fantasy finish for the year.”
“And Trevor Lawrence is playing like a top five quarterback. He is elusive.”
“I am forecasting a relatively nice, surprisingly nice nineteen points for Trevor Lawrence”
“Ericson you got him at six... I don't know if they need all four quarters for him to be a fantasy QB one.”
“I know Lawrence has been great, so I've got him QB ten”
“I have um QB twelve”
“Incoming rookie Trevor Lawrence will be the top overall pick, to the Jaguars”