Loading…
Loading…
CB · Colorado; Jackson State University
84 checkable claims from 43 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
Each pundit’s standing lean on Travis Hunter, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 78% of the room, across 2 articles · 97.9 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bullish than 69% of the room, across 3 articles · 97.9 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 75% of the room, across 2 articles · 80.1 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 66% of the room, across 5 articles · 91.2 accuracy on him (5 settled)
Page 1 of 3 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
Not settled yet. These are graded once the season or event they describe has finished.
more bullish than 59% of the room, across 2 articles · 100.0 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 62% of the room, across 2 articles · 97.9 accuracy on him (2 settled)
“I've got every faith in him being fun for fantasy and a good fantasy football pick in twenty twenty five”
“I have my wide receiver twenty five. I have him at fifty second overall. Right now in real time ADP, he is wide receiver thirty one and seventy fourth overall. I am aggressively ahead”
“So for a wide receiver of that talent to be going outside the top thirty... I think Travis Hunter is still a smash draft.”