Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Pat Fitzmaurice· Jun 14, 2026

Fitzmorris agrees Judkins will be a bell cow but thinks his yardage/TD projections are too aggressive, is excited about Colson Loveland as his TE3 with room to exceed his projection, ranks Jackson Dart QB13 and Jared Goff QB19, sides with the bullish Jameson Williams projection, and calls the Rashee Rice projection too rosy given injury and off-field risk.

I just don't feel the projections are baking in the injury risk and the poor judgment risk here, simple as that.

said on air or in an interview · The Herd with Colin Cowherd (podcast) · read the original →

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence above are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

8 checkable claims — 4 positional finishes, 2 fantasy bust calls, 1 depth chart call and 1 sleeper call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 11 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 5 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the room on 3 and below it on 2.

Where this call stands in the room

Jared Goff · 2026 season · positional finish

5 calls from 5 pundits between 5 positional finish and 19 positional finish. Pat Fitzmaurice said 19 positional finish. the room's median is 12 positional finish. not settled yet

Pat Fitzmaurice19 positional finishthe room — 5 calls from 5 punditsmedian 12 positional finish

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

positional finish
22They said
27The room (3 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

8 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More positional finishes

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.