Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Rich Hribar· Sep 17, 2026

In his Week 2 Colts-Chiefs worksheet, Hribar assigns fantasy tiers to the key players: Mahomes as a fringe QB1, Daniel Jones as a 2QB-only option, Jonathan Taylor as a volume-based RB1, Kenneth Walker as a trust/spike play, Rashee Rice as a WR2, Pierce and Worthy as WR3/FLEX and WR4/FLEX, Downs as a WR4/FLEX, Allen as a touchdown-dependent FLEX, and Kelce as a back-end TE1. He also expects Kansas City to lean on the run and Mansoor Delane to return.

I am still treating Mahomes as a fringe QB1 because I don't want to chase the rushing component being sticky

published in writing · Sharp Football Analysis · read the original →

9 checkable claims — 7 positional finishes, 1 availability call and 1 sleeper call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 11 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 7 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the rest of the room on every one.

Where this call stands in the room

Alec Pierce · 2026 season · positional finish

3 calls from 3 pundits between 15 positional finish and 36 positional finish. Rich Hribar said 36 positional finish. the room's median is 20 positional finish. not settled yet

Rich Hribar36 positional finishthe room — 3 calls from 3 punditsmedian 20 positional finish

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the record

positional finish
48They said
592025 finish

Their call against what actually happened last time. Not yet settled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

9 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More positional finishes

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these

We summarize what a pundit said and quote a short span of it for attribution — we never republish their article. If we have misread you, tell us and we will look at it.